Comments on: Inquiring Minds http://www.sonikcycle.com/syndicate/index.php/archive/inquiring-minds/ Where the syndics of Sonikcycle muse. Sat, 22 Jan 2011 19:07:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Angelene http://www.sonikcycle.com/syndicate/index.php/archive/inquiring-minds/comment-page-1/#comment-12 Angelene Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:04:43 +0000 http://d-128-45-41.bootp.virginia.edu//wordpress/?p=6#comment-12 Tertawa sukar. Hanya kami akan digairahkan mengenai hal seperti ini. Geeky nerds that we are! :-) Tertawa sukar.

Hanya kami akan digairahkan mengenai hal seperti ini.

Geeky nerds that we are!

:-)

]]> By: sonikcycle http://www.sonikcycle.com/syndicate/index.php/archive/inquiring-minds/comment-page-1/#comment-11 sonikcycle Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:13:24 +0000 http://d-128-45-41.bootp.virginia.edu//wordpress/?p=6#comment-11 I tend to think of quantitative analyses as giving us more of the "what," and qualitative analyses as giving us more of the "why." Oversimplified, to be sure, but it helps my simple mind makes sense of a greater whole. <i>Hehehe... Francis, you are the first person whom I do not know that has ever responded to my (albeit minimal) presence on the web! Interestingly, I find this very exciting!....IT WORKS!</i> I tend to think of quantitative analyses as giving us more of the “what,” and qualitative analyses as giving us more of the “why.” Oversimplified, to be sure, but it helps my simple mind makes sense of a greater whole.

Hehehe… Francis, you are the first person whom I do not know that has ever responded to my (albeit minimal) presence on the web! Interestingly, I find this very exciting!….IT WORKS!

]]> By: Francis http://www.sonikcycle.com/syndicate/index.php/archive/inquiring-minds/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Francis Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:53:43 +0000 http://d-128-45-41.bootp.virginia.edu//wordpress/?p=6#comment-10 Interesting site. Came across via Google search. This is true in the scientific community, too. We scoff at qualitative research for being soft and less rigorous, but the truth is that it is a necessary part of filling in the whole picture when describing events. Epistemology must be broadened to include this. Interesting site. Came across via Google search. This is true in the scientific community, too. We scoff at qualitative research for being soft and less rigorous, but the truth is that it is a necessary part of filling in the whole picture when describing events. Epistemology must be broadened to include this.

]]>